A Comparative Study of Tubeless versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) – A Randomized Controlled Study
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction: The tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure is defined as non-placement of double-J stent at the end procedure. There are numerous advantages placement nephrostomy tube in standard PCNL like adequate renal drainage, tamponade effect for bleeding and relook PCNL. Aim: This study aims to determine effectiveness, safety, morbidity by comparing it technique. Methodology: It was a randomized controlled conducted over period two years from (October 2019 November 2021). All patients aged 18-65 age with stone size 1- 2.5cm who underwent our department were included. allocated into groups Group A (Tubeless PCNL) group B (Standard PCNL). randomization done block method sealed envelope system. Results: mean 37.94±12.7 39.38±11.91 years. (Group A20.56±2.87mm, B- 21.54±2.63) both comparable. operative time 47.68 min±5.27, 49.72min±5.18) insignificant result. drop haemoglobin A- 0.70gm% 0.79 gm %) requirement blood transfusion 5(10%) & 8(16%) patients. analgesia (inj. Tramadol (mg) 113 mg ±29.68 172 ±31.87 B) significant p value <0.0001. hospital stay A-3.42±0.72 B-4.2±0.49 days) comparison shows result clearance more than 90% result, P 0.7281. Conclusion: Tubeless an effective alternative potential decreased postoperative pain, requirement, stay.
منابع مشابه
Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE To prospectively compare the outcome of standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SmPCNL) versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TmPCNL) as primary treatments of renal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 80 patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal stone and candidates for PCNL were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40, one group treate...
متن کاملComparative Study between Standard and Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
PURPOSE Several recent studies have reported the benefits of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Postoperatively, tubeless PNL patients have an indwelling ureteral stent placed, which is often associated with stent-related morbidity. We have performed totally tubeless (tubeless and stentless) PNL in which no nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent is placed postoperatively. We evaluated the...
متن کاملStandard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE This article systematically analyses comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL. METHODS The Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and DARE databases were searched from 1997 to February 2011. Comparative studies evaluating outcomes from standard versus tubeless PCNL were included. Primary outcome measure...
متن کاملUltra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL: A randomised clinical trial
Objective To assess the effectiveness and advantages of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UM-PCNL) versus standard PCNL (S-PCNL), as one of the most important differences between the various PCNL techniques is the size of the renal access, which contributes to the broad spectrum of complications and outcomes. Patients and methods This clinical randomised trial was conducted in 2016. In...
متن کاملTubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis
BACKGROUND To update a previously published systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS A systematic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to confirm relevant studies. The scientific literature was screened in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International journal of current research and review
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0975-5241', '2231-2196']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31782/ijcrr.2022.141601